Reasons for Monitoring
Protection of the Environment
Fugitive gas emissions
Leachate seeps
Liner leakage
Slope failures
Gauging System Benefits
Waste stabilization
Gas generation rate and quality
Leachate quality
Settlement rate
Improving System Performance
Compare wetting and gas collection methods
Assess leachate treatment options
Experiment with cover materials for control of gas emissions
Operate anaerobic and hybrid to compare the rate of stabilization
Monitor cold weather operation
Proposed Monitoring for the Buncombe County Bioreactor
Leachate Quality and Quantity
Monthly monitoring (until stable)
Test for pH, BOD, COD, and Ammonia
Monitors leachate treatment and decomposition process
Ongoing for wetting process and leachate removal
Flow meters at each pump station
Needed to obtain optimum moisture content and avoid oversaturation
lllllllll
Gas Composition, Volume, and Flow Rate
Quarterly surface sweeps
Ongoing volume monitoring
Monthly flow monitoring and composition at the wellheads
Determine impact of bioreactor on gas production
Liner System Leakage
Monthly samping and testing
Determine performance of alternative liner system
Waste Stabilization
North Carolina State University – Dr. Barlaz
Buried waste vessels
Test for BMP and moisture content
Settlement
Quarterly survey of plates and annual aerial topographic survey
Monitor rate of settlement and airspace gained